noble-zone ([info]noble_zone) wrote,
@ 2008-06-11 11:08:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
A "The Incredible Hulk" spoiler-free review -- they like it
Clipped from Variety:

What seemed in theory the least necessary revival of a bigscreen superhero emerges as perfectly solid summer action fare in "The Incredible Hulk." Revisiting the character put under a psychological microscope in 2003 to mixed results by Ang Lee and James Schamus, Marvel, Universal and several of the same producers have repackaged one of their better known stable stars in a straightforward actioner that delivers the goods with no unnecessary frills or digressions. Happy to give the intended audience what it wants, this loud and quick-moving production will shake loose ample coin in all markets.

[snip spoiler]

Viewed in this utilitarian light, the new film gets its job done. It's not especially exciting or surprising, lacking the cheek and sheen of "Iron Man" and the opulence and star power of the "Spider-Man" and "X-Men" series. But it's better than the "Fantastic Four" pictures and "Daredevil" and manages to shift the title character from a hopelessly conflicted Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde to a wannabe good guy.

[There's more but it's all plot spoilers.]



(Post a new comment)


[info]zibacco
2008-06-11 06:26 pm UTC (link)
Sounds like the finally figured out the obvious. "Hulk Smash!" is about as complicated as that character needs to be.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]noble_zone
2008-06-11 06:30 pm UTC (link)
Exactly.

Boring shots of lichen is not how you make a Hulk movie. I get that Ang Lee was trying for something else but that was the wrong character for an "indie" superhero flick.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…